弊社のPECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerを利用すれば試験に合格できます
弊社のPECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerは専門家たちが長年の経験を通して最新のシラバスに従って研究し出した勉強資料です。弊社はISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager問題集の質問と答えが間違いないのを保証いたします。
この問題集は過去のデータから分析して作成されて、カバー率が高くて、受験者としてのあなたを助けて時間とお金を節約して試験に合格する通過率を高めます。我々の問題集は的中率が高くて、100%の合格率を保証します。我々の高質量のPECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerを利用すれば、君は一回で試験に合格できます。
安全的な支払方式を利用しています
Credit Cardは今まで全世界の一番安全の支払方式です。少数の手続きの費用かかる必要がありますとはいえ、保障があります。お客様の利益を保障するために、弊社のISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager問題集は全部Credit Cardで支払われることができます。
領収書について:社名入りの領収書が必要な場合、メールで社名に記入していただき送信してください。弊社はPDF版の領収書を提供いたします。
弊社は失敗したら全額で返金することを承諾します
我々は弊社のISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager問題集に自信を持っていますから、試験に失敗したら返金する承諾をします。我々のPECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerを利用して君は試験に合格できると信じています。もし試験に失敗したら、我々は君の支払ったお金を君に全額で返して、君の試験の失敗する経済損失を減少します。
一年間の無料更新サービスを提供します
君が弊社のPECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerをご購入になってから、我々の承諾する一年間の更新サービスが無料で得られています。弊社の専門家たちは毎日更新状態を検査していますから、この一年間、更新されたら、弊社は更新されたPECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerをお客様のメールアドレスにお送りいたします。だから、お客様はいつもタイムリーに更新の通知を受けることができます。我々は購入した一年間でお客様がずっと最新版のPECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerを持っていることを保証します。
弊社は無料PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerサンプルを提供します
お客様は問題集を購入する時、問題集の質量を心配するかもしれませんが、我々はこのことを解決するために、お客様に無料ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerサンプルを提供いたします。そうすると、お客様は購入する前にサンプルをダウンロードしてやってみることができます。君はこのISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager問題集は自分に適するかどうか判断して購入を決めることができます。
ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager試験ツール:あなたの訓練に便利をもたらすために、あなたは自分のペースによって複数のパソコンで設置できます。
TopExamは君にISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerの問題集を提供して、あなたの試験への復習にヘルプを提供して、君に難しい専門知識を楽に勉強させます。TopExamは君の試験への合格を期待しています。
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager 認定 ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager 試験問題:
1. Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
The company faced challenges monitoring the security of its own and third-party systems. An incident involving server downtime exposed vulnerabilities in a third-party service provider's security posture, leading to unauthorized access.
In response, Konzolo launched a thorough vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software and uncovered critical weaknesses due to outdated encryption algorithms. Noah, the IT manager, documented and communicated the findings. Paulina was brought in to lead a forensic investigation, provide actionable insights, and help enhance the company's overall incident response strategy based on ISO/IEC 27035 standards.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which of the following steps for effective security monitoring did Konzolo NOT adhere to?
A) Monitor behavioral analytics
B) Monitor security vulnerabilities
C) Monitor the outsourced services
2. Scenario 2: NoSpace, a forward-thinking e-commerce store based in London, is renowned for its diverse products and advanced technology. To enhance its information security, NoSpace implemented an ISMS according to ISO/IEC 27001 to better protect customer data and ensure business continuity. Additionally, the company adopted ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2 guidelines. Mark, the incident manager at NoSpace, strategically led the entire implementation. He played a crucial role in aligning the company's ISMS with the requirements specified in ISO/IEC 27001, using ISO/IEC 27035-1 guidelines as the foundation.
During a routine internal audit, a minor anomaly was detected in the data traffic that could potentially indicate a security threat. Mark was immediately notified to assess the situation. Then, Mark and his team immediately escalated the incident to crisis management to handle the potential threat without further assessment. The decision was made to ensure a swift response.
After resolving the situation, Mark decided to update the incident management process. During the initial phase of incident management, Mark recognized the necessity of updating NoSpace's information security policies. This included revising policies related to risk management at the organizational level as well as for specific systems, services, or networks. The second phase of the updated incident management process included the assessment of the information associated with occurrences of information security events and the importance of classifying events and vulnerabilities as information security incidents. During this phase, he also introduced a 'count down' process to expedite the evaluation and classification of occurrences, determining whether they should be recognized as information security incidents.
Mark developed a new incident management policy to enhance the organization's resilience and adaptability in handling information security incidents. Starting with a strategic review session with key stakeholders, the team prioritized critical focus areas over less impactful threats, choosing not to include all potential threats in the policy document. This decision was made to keep the policy streamlined and actionable, focusing on the most significant risks identified through a risk assessment. The policy was shaped by integrating feedback from various department heads to ensure it was realistic and enforceable. Training and awareness initiatives were tailored to focus only on critical response roles, optimizing resource allocation and focusing on essential capabilities.
Based on scenario 2, was Mark's information security incident management policy appropriately developed?
A) No, he should have outlined any awareness and training initiatives within the organization that are related to incident management
B) No, the purpose of the information security incident management policy was not appropriately defined, as it failed to address all potential threats
C) Yes, the information security incident management policy was appropriately developed
3. Which element should an organization consider when identifying the scope of their information security incident management?
A) Hardcopy information
B) Both A and B
C) Electronic information
4. Which of the following statements regarding the principles for digital evidence gathering is correct?
A) Relevance means that the DEFR should be able to describe the procedures followed and justify the decision to acquire each item based on its value to the investigation
B) Reliability implies that all processes used in handling digital evidence should be unique and not necessarily reproducible
C) Sufficiency means that only a minimal amount of material should be gathered to avoid unnecessary auditing and justification efforts
5. Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
By introducing its unique cryptocurrency, Konzolo has contributed to the variety of digital currencies and prioritized enhancing the security and reliability of its offerings.
Konzolo aimed to enhance its systems but faced challenges in monitoring the security of its own and third- party systems. These issues became especially evident during an incident that caused several hours of server downtime This downtime was primarily caused by a third-party service provider that failed to uphold strong security measures, allowing unauthorized access.
In response to this critical situation, Konzolo strengthened its information security infrastructure. The company initiated a comprehensive vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software, a cornerstone of its digital currency offerings The scan revealed a critical vulnerability due to the software using outdated encryption algorithms that are susceptible to decryption by modern methods that posed a significant risk of asset exposure Noah, the IT manager, played a central role in this discovery With careful attention to detail, he documented the vulnerability and communicated the findings to the incident response team and management.
Acknowledging the need for expertise in navigating the complexities of information security incident management. Konzolo welcomed Paulina to the team. After addressing the vulnerability and updating the cryptographic algorithms, they recognized the importance of conducting a thorough investigation to prevent future vulnerabilities. This marked the stage for Paulina s crucial involvement. She performed a detailed forensic analysis of the incident, employing automated and manual methods during the collection phase. Her analysis provided crucial insights into the security breach, enabling Konzolo to understand the depth of the vulnerability and the actions required to mitigate it.
Paulina also played a crucial role in the reporting phase, as her comprehensive approach extended beyond analysis. By defining clear and actionable steps for future prevention and response, she contributed significantly to developing a resilient information security incident management system based on ISO/IEC
27035-1 and 27035-2 guidelines. This strategic initiative marked a significant milestone in Konzolo's quest to strengthen its defenses against cyber threats Based on scenario 7, a vulnerability scan at Konzolo revealed a critical vulnerability in the cryptographic wallet software that could lead to asset exposure. Noah, the IT manager, documented the event and communicated it to the incident response team and management. Is this acceptable?
A) Yes, he should document the event and communicate it to the incident response team and management
B) No, he should have waited for confirmation of an actual asset exposure before documenting and communicating the vulnerability
C) No, he should have postponed the documentation process until a full investigation is completed
質問と回答:
質問 # 1 正解: C | 質問 # 2 正解: C | 質問 # 3 正解: B | 質問 # 4 正解: A | 質問 # 5 正解: A |