PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager 問題集

質問 1：
Who is responsible for providing threat intelligence and supporting the lead investigator within an incident response team?
A. IT support staff
B. Team leader
C. Analysts and researchers
正解：C
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 2：
Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
The company faced challenges monitoring the security of its own and third-party systems. An incident involving server downtime exposed vulnerabilities in a third-party service provider's security posture, leading to unauthorized access.
In response, Konzolo launched a thorough vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software and uncovered critical weaknesses due to outdated encryption algorithms. Noah, the IT manager, documented and communicated the findings. Paulina was brought in to lead a forensic investigation, provide actionable insights, and help enhance the company's overall incident response strategy based on ISO/IEC 27035 standards.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which of the following steps for effective security monitoring did Konzolo NOT adhere to?
A. Monitor behavioral analytics
B. Monitor security vulnerabilities
C. Monitor the outsourced services
正解：C
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 3：
Scenario 1: RoLawyers is a prominent legal firm based in Guadalajara, Mexico. It specializes in a wide range of legal services tailored to meet the diverse needs of its clients. Committed to excellence and integrity, RoLawyers has a reputation for providing legal representation and consultancy to individuals, businesses, and organizations across various sectors.
Recognizing the critical importance of information security in today's digital landscape, RoLawyers has embarked on a journey to enhance its information security measures. This company is implementing an information security incident management system aligned with ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2 guidelines. This initiative aims to strengthen RoLawyers' protections against possible cyber threats by implementing a structured incident response process to provide guidance on establishing and maintaining a competent incident response team.
After transitioning its database from physical to online infrastructure to facilitate seamless information sharing among its branches, RoLawyers encountered a significant security incident. A malicious attack targeted the online database, overloading it with traffic and causing a system crash, making it impossible for employees to access it for several hours.
In response to this critical incident, RoLawyers quickly implemented new measures to mitigate the risk of future occurrences. These measures included the deployment of a robust intrusion detection system (IDS) designed to proactively identify and alert the IT security team of potential intrusions or suspicious activities across the network infrastructure. This approach empowers RoLawyers to respond quickly to security threats, minimizing the impact on their operations and ensuring the continuity of its legal services.
By being proactive about information security and incident management, RoLawyers shows its dedication to protecting sensitive data, keeping client information confidential, and earning the trust of its stakeholders.
Using the latest practices and technologies, RoLawyers stays ahead in legal innovation and is ready to handle cybersecurity threats with resilience and careful attention.
According to scenario 1, what information security incident did RoLawyers face?
A. Malware attack
B. Man-in-the-middle attack
C. Denial-of-service attack
正解：C
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 4：
Scenario 8: Moneda Vivo, headquartered in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia, is a distinguished name in the banking sector. It is renowned for its innovative approach to digital banking and unwavering commitment to information security. Moneda Vivo stands out by offering various banking services designed to meet the needs of its clients. Central to its operations is an information security incident management process that adheres to the recommendations of ISO/IEC 27035-1 and 27035-2.
Recently. Moneda Vivo experienced a phishing attack aimed at its employees Despite the bank's swift identification and containment of the attack, the incident led to temporary service outages and data access issues, underscoring the need for improved resilience The response team compiled a detailed review of the attack, offering valuable insights into the techniques and entry points used and identifying areas for enhancing their preparedness.
Shortly after the attack, the bank strengthened its defense by implementing a continuous review process to ensure its incident management procedures and systems remain effective and appropriate While monitoring the incident management process, a trend became apparent. The mean time between similar incidents decreased after a few occurrences; however, Moneda Vivo strategically ignored the trend and continued with regular operations This decision was rooted in a deep confidence in its existing security measures and incident management protocols, which had proven effective in quick detection and resolution of issues Moneda Vivo's commitment to transparency and continual improvement is exemplified by its utilization of a comprehensive dashboard. This tool provides real time insights into the progress of its information security incident management, helping control operational activities and ensure that processes stay within the targets of productivity, quality, and efficiency. However, securing its digital banking platform proved challenging.
Following a recent upgrade, which included a user interface change to its digital banking platform and a software update, Moneda Vivo recognized the need to immediately review its incident management process for accuracy and completeness. The top management postponed the review due to financial and time constraints.
Based on scenario 8, Moneda Vivo conducts continuous review of the incident management process to ensure the effectiveness of processes and procedures in place. Is this a good practice to follow?
A. No, organizations should conduct quarterly performance reviews of individual employees to ensure they follow incident management protocols
B. No, organizations should regularly assess the physical security measures to ensure they align with incident management protocols
C. Yes, organizations should conduct continuous review of the incident management process to ensure the effectiveness of the processes and procedures in place
正解：C
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 5：
Which of the following statements regarding the principles for digital evidence gathering is correct?
A. Relevance means that the DEFR should be able to describe the procedures followed and justify the decision to acquire each item based on its value to the investigation
B. Reliability implies that all processes used in handling digital evidence should be unique and not necessarily reproducible
C. Sufficiency means that only a minimal amount of material should be gathered to avoid unnecessary auditing and justification efforts
正解：A
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)