SAP C_TS452 問題集

質問 1：
A packaging-materials producer is validating centrally governed contract sourcing in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for a division that is retiring a spreadsheet used to track supplier commitments. Buyers can create and release quantity contracts, and approved purchase requisitions are available for conversion. For most material families, purchase-order creation correctly applies the released contract and updates the expected consumption values. However, for one specialty-film family, the purchase order is created with the correct supplier but does not consume the expected contract quantity during validation.
The same contract design works for another material family in the same purchasing organization. The sourcing manager wants the issue corrected before the spreadsheet tracker is retired. Buyers must not update contract usage manually, and the fix must remain standard and transportable for the next rollout phase.
What should the consultant check first?
A. Verify whether the affected specialty-film family is correctly included in the contract-consumption and source-binding settings used during PO creation.
B. Rebuild requisition approval because approved demand should always reduce contract quantities automatically.
C. Broaden buyer authorization so the missing contract-consumption step can be bypassed during order creation.
D. Ask buyers to record the missing contract consumption outside the system until rollout is complete.
正解：A
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 2：
A metal-components manufacturer is validating external procurement for returnable pallets in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after aligning a newly acquired plant to a shared materials-management template. Buyers can create purchase orders, and warehouse users can post goods receipts successfully for the affected materials. However, when the team validates the follow-on financial posting in the acquired plant, the system fails the check for returnable-pallet materials only. The same procurement scenario works in the legacy main plant using the same business process.
A recent transport introduced plant-dependent valuation and posting-control changes for the acquired plant. The implementation lead wants the issue corrected before the acquired plant enters its final cutover rehearsal. Manual finance adjustments are not allowed, and the template must remain standard and transportable for later acquisition waves.
What should the consultant do first?
A. Broaden plant-user authorization so the blocked financial validation can complete during the next test cycle.
B. Review whether the acquired plant’s valuation and account-determination settings are correctly aligned for the returnable-pallet material scenario.
C. Review whether the acquired plant’s valuation and account-determination settings are correctly aligned for the returnable-pallet material scenario.
D. Ask finance to post the returnable-pallet entries manually until the acquired plant stabilizes after go-live.
正解：B
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 3：
A specialty-paper manufacturer is validating centrally governed scheduling-agreement sourcing in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for a division that is retiring a spreadsheet used to track supplier call-off commitments. Buyers can create and release scheduling agreements, and approved requisitions are available for conversion. For most coated-paper groups, purchase-order creation correctly applies the released scheduling agreement and allows the expected follow-on schedule management. However, for one laminated-paper group, the purchase order is created with the correct supplier but without the expected scheduling-agreement assignment, so downstream delivery scheduling cannot proceed as designed.
The same sourcing setup works for another paper group in the same purchasing organization. The sourcing lead wants the issue corrected before the spreadsheet tracker is retired. Buyers must not maintain supplier commitments manually, and the fix must remain standard and transportable for the next rollout wave.
What should the consultant check first?
A. Rebuild requisition approval because approved demand should always carry the scheduling-agreement assignment into purchase-order creation.
B. Verify whether the affected laminated-paper group is correctly included in the scheduling-agreement source binding and follow-on determination settings used during PO creation.
C. Broaden buyer authorization so the missing scheduling-agreement assignment can be bypassed during order creation.
D. Ask buyers to enter the scheduling-agreement reference manually for the laminated-paper group until rollout is complete.
正解：B
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 4：
A catering-equipment supplier is validating conversion of approved purchase requisitions into standard purchase orders in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for a newly introduced spare-accessories category. Requesters can create requisitions in SAP Fiori, and approval completes successfully for all test cases. For most categories, buyers convert the approved requisitions into purchase orders without difficulty. However, for the new accessories category, the approved requisitions remain selectable but fail during conversion because the item does not inherit the required downstream purchasing control state.
The same buyers can convert similar requisitions for another category in the same purchasing organization. The rollout lead wants the issue corrected before the next automated regression cycle. Buyers must not use workaround document types, and the solution must remain standard because later category activations will reuse the same design.
What should the consultant check first?
A. Verify whether the affected accessories category is correctly linked to the downstream item-processing and purchasing-document determination settings.
B. Broaden buyer authorization so the blocked conversion can bypass the missing downstream control state.
C. Ask buyers to use a temporary alternative purchasing document for the accessories category until rollout is complete.
D. Rebuild requisition approval because approved demand should always move into the correct purchase-order processing state.
正解：A
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 5：
An implementation team is validating supplier invoice processing in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition before opening the test cycle to shared-service finance users. Buyers have completed purchase orders, and warehouse staff have posted goods receipts successfully. When invoice processors enter invoices for selected suppliers, the system allows document entry but prevents final posting for only one processor group. Another processor group can complete the same activity in the same company code.
The security lead confirms that both groups were intended to have similar operational scope, but only one group was included in a recent role cleanup designed to tighten access before go-live. The project sponsor wants the issue fixed in a controlled way. No emergency broad-access role should be assigned because governance and auditability are under active review.
What should the consultant do first?
A. Recreate the supplier invoices under the working processor group because document origin often affects posting eligibility.
B. Disable the access cleanup controls temporarily and retest after all invoices have been entered.
C. Compare the invoice-posting authorization scope of the two processor groups and restore only the missing role-based permissions required for standard posting.
D. Assign a broad finance role to the blocked processor group so invoice testing can continue without delay.
正解：C
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)