CIPS L5M1 問題集

質問 1：
Discuss 3 main sources of conflict that may arise within a group (15 points). What positive and negative outcomes may arise from conflict? (10 points).
正解：
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Part A - Sources of Conflict (15 points):
Conflict is natural in groups and arises when individuals or teams have incompatible goals, interests, or behaviours. Three common sources are:
Task-based conflict - This occurs when members disagree about the content of the work, objectives, or methods. For example, in a procurement team, conflict may arise over whether to prioritise cost savings or sustainability in supplier selection.
Relationship conflict - This stems from personality clashes, communication breakdowns, or differences in working styles. For instance, an extroverted negotiator may clash with an introverted analyst who prefers data-driven approaches.
Resource conflict - Groups often compete for limited resources such as time, budget, or staff. In procurement, this could occur if multiple project teams require the same supplier's resources or internal budgets.
Part B - Outcomes of Conflict (10 points):
Positive outcomes:
Can lead to creativity and innovation as different perspectives are debated.
Encourages problem-solving and improvement of processes.
Strengthens understanding when conflicts are resolved constructively.
Negative outcomes:
May reduce morale and trust if personal attacks or unresolved tension occur.
Can delay projects, damage productivity, and harm relationships with stakeholders or suppliers.
Creates stress and alienation, leading to higher turnover if prolonged.
In procurement, positive conflict may lead to innovative supplier solutions, while negative conflict may damage supplier negotiations or internal collaboration.
Conclusion:
The three main sources of conflict are task, relationship, and resource issues. Conflict is not always harmful - it can drive improvement and creativity if managed well, but if left unresolved, it can damage morale, performance, and stakeholder relationships. Managers must therefore encourage constructive conflict while minimising destructive forms.

質問 2：
What is meant by group conformity? In what ways can 'Groupthink' affect the behaviour of a group? (25 points)
正解：
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Group Conformity (10 marks):
Group conformity refers to the tendency of individuals to align their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours with the norms of the group to which they belong. People conform because they want acceptance, fear rejection, or assume the group's judgement is correct. Conformity ensures cohesion and cooperation but may limit creativity. For example, in procurement, a junior buyer may adopt the team's approach to negotiations, even if they personally believe another method could achieve better results.
Groupthink and its Effects (15 marks):
'Groupthink', a term developed by Irving Janis, occurs when the desire for consensus overrides realistic appraisal of alternatives. Members suppress doubts, ignore risks, and fail to voice disagreements to maintain harmony. This can seriously affect group behaviour in several ways:
Illusion of invulnerability - Groups may become overconfident and underestimate risks. For example, a procurement team might agree to single-source a supplier without considering supply chain risks.
Suppression of dissent - Members may withhold concerns to avoid conflict. This stifles creativity and prevents better solutions from being considered.
Pressure for uniformity - Individuals may feel obliged to agree even when they disagree. A buyer may stay silent when senior managers push for a supplier contract, even if they know the supplier has performance issues.
Biased decision-making - Groups may ignore warning signs or alternative perspectives, leading to flawed decisions. In procurement, this could mean overlooking ethical issues in a supplier relationship to maintain harmony with stakeholders.
Reduced accountability - Responsibility is shared across the group, so individuals may feel less accountable for poor decisions.
Groupthink can therefore lead to poor decision-making, increased risk, and lost opportunities. It is particularly dangerous in high-stakes environments like procurement, where mistakes in supplier selection or contract negotiation can damage cost, quality, and reputation.
Conclusion:
Group conformity means individuals adapt to group norms to gain acceptance, while groupthink is a negative consequence where consensus is prioritised over critical evaluation. For managers, recognising the risk of groupthink is vital. By encouraging open discussion, appointing a "devil's advocate," and welcoming diverse views, leaders can ensure group decisions are both inclusive and effective.

質問 3：
Describe THREE ways in which a procurement professional could be biased when selecting suppliers to work with (15 points). What are the benefits of remaining unbiased when selecting suppliers? (10 points).
正解：
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Part A - Three Ways a Procurement Professional Could Be Biased (15 marks):
Personal Relationships / Conflicts of Interest:
A buyer may favour a supplier due to friendship, family connection, or long-standing personal ties. For example, awarding a contract to a supplier owned by a relative, even if another supplier offers better value. This undermines fairness and can damage organisational reputation.
Preference for Incumbent Suppliers (Status Quo Bias):
Professionals may repeatedly select the same suppliers simply because they are familiar, ignoring new entrants who could provide better innovation, cost savings, or sustainability. This limits competition and supplier diversity.
Cultural or Geographical Bias:
A procurement professional may favour local suppliers over international ones, or show unconscious bias against suppliers from certain regions. While local sourcing can have benefits, excluding other suppliers without objective evaluation reduces fairness and potentially increases costs.
(Other possible biases include brand preference, ignoring SMEs, or favouring suppliers who provide personal benefits - but only three are required for full marks.) Part B - Benefits of Remaining Unbiased (10 marks):
Remaining unbiased means making supplier decisions based on objective, transparent, and fair criteria such as cost, quality, delivery performance, risk, and sustainability. The benefits include:
Fairness and Transparency: All suppliers have equal opportunity, protecting the organisation's integrity and compliance with regulations.
Best Value for Money: Objective evaluation ensures the chosen supplier offers the best mix of cost, quality, and service.
Encouraging Innovation: By considering a wider pool of suppliers, procurement can benefit from new ideas and technologies.
Ethical Compliance: Avoids corruption, fraud, or bribery, maintaining alignment with the CIPS Code of Conduct.
Reputation and Trust: Stakeholders and the market see the organisation as professional and ethical, which strengthens long-term supplier relationships.
Conclusion:
Procurement professionals may show bias through personal relationships, favouring incumbents, or cultural preferences. Remaining unbiased ensures decisions are fair, transparent, and ethical, leading to better value, innovation, and stronger supplier trust. This supports both organisational objectives and the professional standards of procurement.

質問 4：
Zarah is the Head of Procurement at a hospital. She feels that the Procurement Department is understaffed and due to the large volume of work she has decided to put together a business case to recruit one additional Procurement Assistant. Explain the process Zarah should complete in order to create this Business Case. (25 points).
正解：
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
When preparing a business case for additional resource, Zarah should follow a structured process to ensure that the proposal is clear, evidence-based, and aligned with the hospital's strategic objectives.
The first step is to identify the need. Zarah must gather evidence to show that the current department is understaffed and unable to manage the workload effectively. This may include statistics on increased purchase orders, supplier contracts, delays, or risks caused by the lack of staff.
Secondly, she should define the objectives of the business case. In this case, the objective is to secure funding and approval for an additional Procurement Assistant to ensure efficiency, compliance, and risk management in hospital procurement.
Thirdly, Zarah must analyse options. The business case should not only present recruitment as the only choice but also consider alternatives such as outsourcing, redistributing workload, or temporary staff. Each option should be reviewed in terms of cost, feasibility, and benefits.
Fourthly, she should present the costs and benefits. The costs will include salary, training, and any associated overheads. The benefits may include faster order processing, reduced errors, improved supplier management, compliance with healthcare regulations, and freeing up senior staff for strategic tasks. Non-financial benefits, such as improved staff morale and better patient outcomes through timely supply of materials, should also be highlighted.
The fifth step is to assess risks. For example, not hiring an additional assistant may risk delays in ordering medical supplies, poor compliance with procurement standards, and reputational damage to the hospital. Conversely, recruiting without sufficient workload planning could lead to under-utilisation of resources.
Sixthly, Zarah should recommend the preferred option. Based on evidence, she would recommend hiring one additional Procurement Assistant as the best way to meet the workload demands while delivering value.
Finally, she should prepare the formal document and presentation for hospital executives or the finance committee. The business case should be structured with an introduction, background, options, costs/benefits, risks, and recommendations.
Conclusion:
To create a strong business case, Zarah must identify the need, set clear objectives, analyse options, present costs and benefits, assess risks, and make a clear recommendation. A well-prepared business case will increase the likelihood of approval and ensure the procurement team has the resources needed to deliver efficient, compliant, and high-quality outcomes for the hospital.